Creekside Chat
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, In Her Own Words
A Plan for Peace*
By MARGARET SANGER
FIRST, put into action President Wilson's fourteen points, upon which terms Germany and Austria surrendered to the Allies in 1918.
Second, have Congress set up a special department for the study of population problems and appoint a Parliament of Population, the directors representing the various branches of science this body to direct and control the population through birth rates and immigration, and to direct its distribution over the country according to national needs consistent with taste, fitness and interest of the individuals.
The main objects of the Population Congress would be ...
a.) to raise the level and increase the general intelligence of population
b.) to increase the population slowly by keeping the birth rate at its present level of fifteen per thousand, decreasing the death rate below its present mark of 11 per thousand
c.) to keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feeble-minded, idiots, morons, insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class barred by the immigration laws of 1924
d.) to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring
e.) to insure the country against future burdens of maintenance for numerous offspring as may be born of feeble-minded parents, by pensioning all persons with transmissible disease who voluntarily consent to sterilization
f.) to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization
g.) to apportion farm lands and homesteads for these segregated persons where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives
The first step would thus be to control the intake and output of morons, mental defectives, epileptics.
The second step would be to take an inventory of the secondary group such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends, classify them in special departments under government medical protection, and segregate them on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct.
Having corralled this enormous part of our population and placed it on a basis of health instead of punishment, it is safe to say that fifteen or twenty millions of our population would then be organized into soldiers of defense--defending the unborn against their own disabilities.
The third step would be to give special attention to the mothers' health, to see that women who are suffering from tuberculosis, heart or kidney disease, toxic goiter, gonorrhea, or any disease where the condition of pregnancy disturbs their health are placed under public health nurses to instruct them in practical, scientific methods of contraception in order to safeguard their lives-thus reducing maternal mortality.
The above steps may seem to place emphasis on a health program instead of on tariffs, moratoriums and debts, but I believe that national health is the first essential factor in any program for universal peace.
With the future citizen safeguarded from hereditary taints, with five million mental and moral degenerates segregated, with ten million women and ten million children receiving adequate care, we could then turn our attention to the basic needs for international peace.
There would then be a definite effort to make population increase slowly and at a specified rate, in order to accommodate and adjust increasing numbers to the best social and economic system.
In the meantime we should organize and join an International League of Low Birth Rate Nations to secure and maintain World Peace.
Sources
Birth Control Review, April 1932. Pages 107, 108 (PDF pages 11, 12)http://library.lifedynamics.com/Birth%20Control%20Review/1932-04%20April.pdf
History of Eugenics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_eugenics
Friday, February 21, 2014
Seven of the Ten Richest U.S. Counties Seemingly Depend of the Federal Government
According to recent Census Bureau data, seven of the ten richest counties in the United States seemingly depend on the tax- and debt-funded federal government. "Richest" is based on the county's median household income.
Six of the top 10 counties surrounds the nation's capital in Washington, D.C., home to a variety of federal agencies, departments, and bedroom communities for government workers. The less obvious member of the list is Los Alamos County in New Mexico, home to the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
When you think of rich counties, which come to mind? Parts of Silicon Valley are quite affluent, yet Santa Clara County, CA is number 17 on the list. Marin County, CA is number 19.
You can download the Census Bureau's data spreadsheet here. The spreadsheet also shows the poorest U.S. counties based on median household income.
- Falls Church City, VA ($121,250)
- Loudoun County, VA ($118,934)
- Los Alamos County, NM ($112,115)
- Howard County, MD ($108,234)
- Fairfax County, VA ($106,690)
- Hunterdon County, NJ ($103,301)
- Arlington County, VA ($99,255)
- Douglas County, CO ($98,426)
- Stafford County, VA ($95,927)
- Somerset County, NJ ($95,574)
Six of the top 10 counties surrounds the nation's capital in Washington, D.C., home to a variety of federal agencies, departments, and bedroom communities for government workers. The less obvious member of the list is Los Alamos County in New Mexico, home to the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
When you think of rich counties, which come to mind? Parts of Silicon Valley are quite affluent, yet Santa Clara County, CA is number 17 on the list. Marin County, CA is number 19.
You can download the Census Bureau's data spreadsheet here. The spreadsheet also shows the poorest U.S. counties based on median household income.
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Is the 2013 California Attack on PG&E and AT&T Related to Similar 2009 AT&T Incident?
In April 2013, there was a seemingly orchestrated attack on a PG&E electrical transmission facility and on the AT&T telecommunications network. The incident was scarcely reported at the time, likely because of the Boston Marathon Bombing that happened the day before. The incident was also characterized as "vandalism" but the facts suggest something a bit more ominous. Nearly a year later, the incident is rightfully attracting some new media attention (WSJ, TheBlaze).
During the 2013, parties unknown cut telecommunications cables in South San Jose, CA. Fiber optic and other cables were cut in two locations near Pacific Gas & Electric's (PG&E) Metcalf power substation. Later, multiple gunmen opened fire at the PG&E substation damaging 17 electrical transformers in an apparent effort to knock out power. The telecommunications outage cut phone, cell phone, internet, and 911 service to thousands of people and businesses.
Some argue that the 2013 attack was a dry-run for a future, larger attack. Upon hearing the details, I've wondered if the April 2013 incident is related to a similar incident that happened four years earlier in nearly the same location.
In April 2009, parties unknown cut ten fiber optic cables in at least three different locations. Six of the cables were cut within three miles of the site of the 2013 incidents, straight up Old Monterey Road (Old Monterey Highway). In the 2009 incident, cables were also cut 33 miles away, but within easy access by car from the first site via Highway 101. At the time, some suspected members of the Communication Workers of American (CWA) union, who were in a labor dispute with AT&T. Those who cut the cables supposedly knew where to find the cables and how to cause the most damage.
Could the two incidents be related? It is only a theory on my part at the moment but the location and modus operandi seem similar enough to warrant more investigation.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304851104579359141941621778
The Blaze: Chilling: Why An Underreported, ‘Significant Incident of Domestic Terrorism’ Might Not Be a Failed Attack at All
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/12/how-has-the-most-significant-incident-of-domestic-terrorism-involving-the-enery-grid-gone-largely-unreported-for-10-months/
CBS News Bay Area: Vandalism At San Jose PG&E Substation Called ‘Sabotage’
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/04/16/gunshots-cause-oil-spill-at-san-jose-pge-substation/
NBC News Bay Area: AT&T Offers $250,000 Reward for Fiber Vandalism
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Gunshots-Vandalism-at-PGE-Substation-in-San-Jose-203200601.html
Santa Cruz Sentinel: Internet, cellphone customers cut off by outage: Fiber cut in Santa Clara County a challenge to repair
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_23040335/at-t-customers-cut-off-by-outage
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Sabotage-attacks-knock-out-phone-service-3245380.php
San Jose Mercury News: San Jose police: Sabotage caused phone outage in Santa Clara, Santa Cruz counties
http://www.mercurynews.com/localnewsheadlines/ci_12106300
During the 2013, parties unknown cut telecommunications cables in South San Jose, CA. Fiber optic and other cables were cut in two locations near Pacific Gas & Electric's (PG&E) Metcalf power substation. Later, multiple gunmen opened fire at the PG&E substation damaging 17 electrical transformers in an apparent effort to knock out power. The telecommunications outage cut phone, cell phone, internet, and 911 service to thousands of people and businesses.
Some argue that the 2013 attack was a dry-run for a future, larger attack. Upon hearing the details, I've wondered if the April 2013 incident is related to a similar incident that happened four years earlier in nearly the same location.
In April 2009, parties unknown cut ten fiber optic cables in at least three different locations. Six of the cables were cut within three miles of the site of the 2013 incidents, straight up Old Monterey Road (Old Monterey Highway). In the 2009 incident, cables were also cut 33 miles away, but within easy access by car from the first site via Highway 101. At the time, some suspected members of the Communication Workers of American (CWA) union, who were in a labor dispute with AT&T. Those who cut the cables supposedly knew where to find the cables and how to cause the most damage.
Could the two incidents be related? It is only a theory on my part at the moment but the location and modus operandi seem similar enough to warrant more investigation.
Sources:
2013 Incident
Wall Street Journal: Assault on California Power Station Raises Alarm on Potential for Terrorismhttp://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304851104579359141941621778
The Blaze: Chilling: Why An Underreported, ‘Significant Incident of Domestic Terrorism’ Might Not Be a Failed Attack at All
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/12/how-has-the-most-significant-incident-of-domestic-terrorism-involving-the-enery-grid-gone-largely-unreported-for-10-months/
CBS News Bay Area: Vandalism At San Jose PG&E Substation Called ‘Sabotage’
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/04/16/gunshots-cause-oil-spill-at-san-jose-pge-substation/
NBC News Bay Area: AT&T Offers $250,000 Reward for Fiber Vandalism
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Gunshots-Vandalism-at-PGE-Substation-in-San-Jose-203200601.html
Santa Cruz Sentinel: Internet, cellphone customers cut off by outage: Fiber cut in Santa Clara County a challenge to repair
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_23040335/at-t-customers-cut-off-by-outage
2009 Incident
San Francisco Chronicle: Sabotage attacks knock out phone servicehttp://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Sabotage-attacks-knock-out-phone-service-3245380.php
San Jose Mercury News: San Jose police: Sabotage caused phone outage in Santa Clara, Santa Cruz counties
http://www.mercurynews.com/localnewsheadlines/ci_12106300
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)