Showing posts with label Proposition 27. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proposition 27. Show all posts

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Elizabeth Warren and a Very Strange Bedfellow


Everyone knows that Elizabeth Warren is a champion of financial reform, right?  She's got a good reputation, which is one of the reasons that she's running for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts.  She's the darling of Occupy Wall Street people looking for real reform of the American political system, supposedly free from the corrupting influence of big-money politics.

They say that politics makes for strange bedfellows.  Need a blatant example?  He's an invitation for a fundraiser for Elizabeth Warren's campaign.  See anything unusual?  Let's just focus on one name.
Why would ANYBODY pretending to be a champion for middle-class, against the supposed oppression and corruption of the super-rich, associate themselves with George Soros?

George Soros is a speculator and hedge-fund manager who currently ranks at number 7 on the Forbes list of richest Americans.  While the fortunes of most Americans plummeted  during the financial crisis, his increased.


George Soros is also the #4 top funder of shadowy 527 committees.


George Soros is also one of the founding members of the so-called "Shadow Party" within the Democratic Party.

Soros is a New York resident.  Ms. Warren is running for office in Massachusetts.  George Soros is active in the politics of other states, including here in California.  He and other well-connected, big-money Democrats funded Proposition 27, designed to eliminate citizen-based reforms of California's redistricting process.

In my opinion, Proposition 27 was a very anti-democratic piece of legislation (which was supported, naturally, by various Progressive politicians and labor unions).



Be careful, people.  You can tell a lot about someone by the people with whom they associate.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Van Jones is the Source for "Koch Plantation"

At a Tea Party counter-union rally in Jefferson City, Missouri, a MoveOn.org counter-counter protester responded to a sign proclaiming "Liberty, Not Slavery" by telling the Tea Party members that "You're on Koch's plantation." The incident was reported by Gateway Pundit and later on the The Blaze. The reference was obviously to the supposedly "evil" Koch Brothers, who fund Americans for Prosperity (AFP), a major ally of the Tea Party. Oh, and David Koch also funds NOVA on PBS (scroll to the bottom of the PBS page) so you know he must be evil, right?


That phrase, "Koch's plantation," sounded familiar. Where had I heard it before?

In January 2011, the Koch Brothers held a secretive meeting in Palm Springs for the ultrawealthy and the well-connected on the Right. Many from the American Left were there to protest (and protest they did).

The "Koch plantation" reference comes directly from a Van Jones speech, at a meeting sponsored by Common Cause to protest the Koch Brothers' event.

The "plantation" line is at about 6 minutes, 55 seconds ([6:55]) into the video.

"We will not live on a national plantation run by the Koch Brothers."


The remainder of the speech is classic Van Jones partisan, class-warfare rhetoric with a few quotable moments.

[0:22]
"I was born in 1968 ... that was the year 'They' assassinated hope in America."

Hmm, so who is this nameless "They" for whom Van Jones cannot mention? Is he aware of some conspiracy that he dare not mention? There were many prominent political figures assassinated in 1968, including political violence throughout the United States.
  • Martin Luther King: April 4, 1968 by James Earl Ray, a long-time criminal and white supremacist. The assassination sparked riots across the United States, including in Washington, D.C., Chicago, Baltimore, Louisville, Wilmington, Kansas City--many of which were most damaging to black communities themselves.
  • Robert Kennedy: June 5, 1968, carefully premeditated by Sirhan Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian immigrant.
  • Violent protests at the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago. The protests were held by groups to the left of the Democratic Party at large, including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Some SDS members later went on to form the Weather Underground domestic terrorist organization.
  • There were protests by Left-wing organizations around the globe.
Van Jones seems fascinated by '68, the year of his birth. His Twitter account is @VanJones68.

[0:39]
"... and 'They' tried to assassinate hope in our country."

Again, who is "They"? Misguided white supremacists? Palestinians? The Democratic Party? Rioters?

[0:50]
Speaks about 40 years in the Wilderness.

[4:47]
"Our political process has been hijacked by people who are only interested in their own gain, who are only interested in their own profit, and are willing to tell any lie, and spend any amount of money, to prevent America's government from coming to the rescue of the American people."

Unfortunately, many Americans feel that government has become the problem--not the solution. I do not want to be "rescued" by a government that wishes to dictate every matter in my life. Nor do I wish the government to confiscate my wealth to pay for other's follies.

[5:15]
Talks about Tea Party and their concern about Liberty. But, there are two threats. Over-concentration of political power. But there is a greater threat. Excessive concentration of economic power.

[9:12]
"If you want to know what side to bet on, ... big money mean people ... or little people with the truth on their side ... look over there in Egypt"

... attendee ...
[9:33]
"Bring Egypt here!"

I find it amazing that the Left is so worried about the Koch Brothers and is evidently is not bothered or worried about the spending by the likes of Stephen Bing, Peter B. Lewis, Fred Eychaner, Haim Saban, Peter Angelos, George Soros, etc., etc., shown here and here. Or, how about those well-connected, ultrawealthy from the Left, many from outside of California, that attempted to impose and formally institute one-party rule in California by passing Proposition 27? Even Common Cause, who openly fights the secretive ways on the Koch Brothers, fought against the alliance of well-financed backers of Proposition 27. For that, I give Common Cause some credit.

See also ...

"Capital Rivals: Koch Brothers vs. George Soros"

"Koch Industries Continues to Expand Political Influence"

"California Proposition 27, Elimination of Citizen Redistricting Commission (2010)"

"Proposition 27 Revealed!"

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

One of These Things Is Not Like the Others ...


Cookie Monster of Sesame Street fame teaches children how to spot important difference while singing his equally-famous "One of These Things Is Not Like the Others" song. Let's see if we can spot any differences in how most Californians think about redistricting.

There were two -- count 'em two! -- redistricting measures on the November 2010 ballot in California. One, Proposition 20, extended existing redistricting reforms by empowering the Citizens Redistrict Commission to draw U.S. Congressional districts. Proposition 20 passed with a 60% plus majority.

The second redistricting initiative on the ballot was Proposition 27. Proposition 27's aim was to eliminate the Citizens Redistricting Commission and to return redistricting control back to the California Legislature. Why was this a bad idea? First, the California Legislature is dominated by one party with nearly a 2-to-1 majority. Second, everybody remembers the horrible job that the Legislature did drawing the 2001 political district lines. Proposition 27 was funded by 25 self-serving incumbent politicians and their well-connected, big-money party donors--many from outside of California! No surprise, Californians rejected Proposition 27, also by nearly a 60% majority.

At the county level, both Proposition 20 and Proposition 27 were nearly universally approved or rejected statewide. Note the key word, "nearly." One county, and only one county, voted completely opposite of all the others. See if you can spot which one. Look carefully.
Spot the difference yet? Look along the West coast (the left edge) mid-way up the state.

San Francisco county was the only California county to oppose Proposition 20 and support Proposition 27.

Initial Reflection on California 2010 Election Results


As a fourth-generation Californian and a fiscal conservative, I am obviously disappointed by the 2010 election results. I have little respect for Jerry Brown and even lower expectations from his second Gubernatorial administration. I cannot fathom how Californians could re-elect Senator Boxer, but I do acknowledge their hesitation with Carly Fiorina (I supported Tom Campbell in the primary). Are these really the best leaders that California can produce?

Fortunately, there were a few positives from the election.

First and foremost, the naked power grab by the Democratic Party oligarchy in California, Proposition 27, failed at the ballot box by nearly a 60% majority. Proposition 27's aim was to disband the Citizens Redistricting Commission and to return redistricting decisions to the California Legislature, currently dominated by the Democrats with a nearly 2-to-1 majority. Proposition 27 was funded by many well-connected, big money donors to the Democratic Party, many from outside California! For more information, see ...

Proposition 27 Revealed!

Interestingly, the electorate not only defeated Proposition 27 but also passed Proposition 20 by a 60%+ majority. Proposition 20 increased the power and scope of the Citizens Redistricting Commission by expanding their redistricting responsibilities to include U.S. Congressional districts. This has big implications for future elections especially given the changes in the 2010 Census. As evidence that redistricting reform is needed, just look at how many California incumbents were re-elected in a year when other states removed long-standing incumbents from office. The poster boy for redistricting reform is 20-term Congressman Pete Stark, who received over 95% of his campaign contributions from out-of-state political action committees (PACs). Does he work for his constituents or for his benefactors?

Bill Lockyer was re-elected state Treasurer. Interestingly, in an 2009 address to the California Legislature he said, "Particularly I would say to the Democrats, in an era when we aren't going to have tax increases, give it up. Figure out how to be more efficient about spending the money we've got."

His words were prescient about other California 2010 election results.
  • Proposition 21 failed. There will be no additional car fees to pay for state parks (although I supported this one).
  • Proposition 22 passed. The state can no longer raid local governments for funds.
  • Proposition 24 failed. There will be no repeal of earlier corporate tax breaks.
  • Proposition 26 passed. Fee increases now require a 2/3rd majority vote, just like taxes.
California's future will be interesting, to say the least. Over the last decade, California's government spending increased both as a percent of gross domestic product (GDP, or the size of the economy) and per person, adjusted for inflation (shown here as constant 2005 dollars).


The state's taxpayers still face a massively underfunded state employee pension problem along with dwindling tax revenues. The pension problem was spawned by the California Legislature when it approved overly generous pension benefits with SB 400 passed in 1999. Ahhhh, yes. Remember 1999? We were all going to get rich selling dog food from our web site--and then the Internet bubble popped. Californians and California businesses long ago adjusted to that economic reality. California's state government and pension system has yet to confront either the economic reality of the 2000 Internet bubble or the 2008 sub-prime mortgage bubble.

It's impossible for this Legislature to reform the pension system and if we don't, we bankrupt the state.
...
And I don't think anybody can do it here because of who elected you. You're just captive of the current environment. I don't see any way out.
It really inspires confidence and provides hope for the future, doesn't it? What exactly did Bill Lockyer mean when he said, "I don't think anybody can do it here because of WHO elected you"? Who elected the California Legislators? Wasn't it the people? Or, was Bill Lockyer merely acknowledging the people that PAID to elect many of the California Legislature--namely public sector unions. After all, according to the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC), the California Teachers Association (CTA) and the California State Council of Service Employees (a.k.a. SEIU) are the two largest spenders in California politics, attempting to influence voters and public officials. See the full list on page 10 in the following document.

Big Money Talks: California's Billion Dollar Club

After the 2010 election, California Democrats now have nearly unanimous control of the State of California, including the following offices.
  • Governor (Jerry Brown)
  • Lt. Governor (Gavin Newsom)
  • Secretary of State (Debra Bowen)
  • Controller (John Chiang)
  • Treasurer (Bill Lockyer)
  • Attorney General (likely at the time of this writing)
  • Insurance Commissioner (Dave Jones)
  • A nearly two-thirds majority in the California Senate
  • A nearly two-thirds majority in the California Assembly
California Democrats now OWN the government's response to success or failure of the California economy going forward. I hope and pray that they can show real leadership in addressing state's many daunting challenges. First and foremost, they must confront their traditional allies in California's public sector unions and adjust California's budget to reflect economic reality.

Personally, I expect conditions to deteriorate as more California taxpayers and businesses move to other states or at least leave California's taxation authority.

For a great read on how California arrived in this horrible situation, I recommend ...

The Golden State’s War on Itself: How politicians turned the California Dream into a nightmare

Monday, September 13, 2010

Proposition 27 Revealed!

[NOTE: This is a work in progress, updated last on 3-NOV-2010, 10:15 AM. Revision history at end.]

THANK YOU Californians! Together, we defeated this naked power grab by the party and politicians currently in power. Proposition 27 failed by nearly a 60% margin!

SUMMARY:

  • Proposition 27 appears on the November 2010 ballot in California.
  • If passed, Proposition 27 would essentially eliminate the redistricting reforms created by 2008's Proposition 11 and return the responsibility of redrawing political boundaries back to the California State Legislature.
  • The California Legislature is dominated by members of a single political party with nearly a 2-to-1 majority.
  • Every major California newspaper recommends NO on PROPOSITION 27.
  • In an apparent naked power grab, twenty-six (26) self-serving incumbent Californian politicians, all Democrats, support and fund the committee in favor of Proposition 27.
  • The list of politicians includes the current U.S. Speaker of the House and both the current and former Speakers of the California Assembly.
  • Many of the U.S. Congressional Representatives on the list are also members of the Congresional Progressive Caucus, who typically represent the far-left wing of the Democratic Party.
  • Big-money donors to the Democratic party are major contributors, including a $2,000,000 ($2 MILLION) donation from billionaire media mogul Haim Saban. Controversial billionaire investor George Soros is also a major contributor. At least four billionaires have contributed.
  • Labor unions, a traditional ally of the Democratic Party, are also major contributors, including $1,250,000 ($1.25 MILLION) from the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) union, $1 MILLION from the American Federation of Teachers union, and $500,000 from a front organization for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners union, and $200,000 from the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).
  • Many of the poltician's campaigns are also directly funded by the same unions.
  • The California Democratic Party also contributed $375,000.
  • Many of those funding Proposition 27 also funded the campaign against the 2005 redistricting reform, or No on Prop. 77.

THE DETAILS:

Remember when the Democratic Party represented the common man? Remember when the Democratic Party fought to empower "The People"? Remember when the Democratic Party fought against the big money that corrupts politics? California's ballot Proposition 27 reveals the true face of the modern California Democratic Party, currently dominated by Progressives! The hypocrisy behind Proposition 27 is staggering, even by California standards.

What is Proposition 27? According to the California Legislative Analyst's Office, it is designed to block the necessary reforms mandated by an earlier ballot proposition, Proposition 11. Proposition 11 empowers a balanced, non-partisan Citizens Redistricting Commission to redraw the highly-Gerrymandered political districts in California.

Why did Californians pass Proposition 11 that created the Citizens Redistricting Commission?

  • Many California citizens felt that their state assembly and senate districts were Gerrymandered by Legislators to ensure that incumbent politicians were guaranteed re-election in non-competitive elections.
  • Many citizens felt that public-employee and union money unduly influenced California's elections and Legislators.
  • Many citizens wanted control for drawing political districts removed from the Legislature and placed in the hands of a non-partisan citizens commissions.

The people and organizations that are financing support for Proposition 27 are a very interesting and revealing mix of the Democratic Party establishment, incumbent California Democratic politicians, labor unions, and secretive big-money donors to ... you guessed it ... the Democratic Party.

The list of donors supporting Proposition 27 is available here and is updated as public-disclosure forms are filed.

http://www.electiontrack.com/lookup.php?committee=1323672

Here is another source for the same information, courtesy of the California Secretary of State.

http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1323672&session=2009&view=late1

Democratic Party Establishment

The California Democratic Party contributed directly to support Proposition 27. Why? Because the Democratics apparently have the most to lose in free and fair elections. The party has carefully cobbled together a financing support network with various labor interests.

Democratic State Central Committee of California

  • $375,000 contribution
Incumbent California Democratic Politicians

Which incumbent Democratic politicians are attempting to protect their political careers in open contradiction to the will of the people? The list includes the current Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, and the both the current and former Speakers of the California Assembly.

Many of these same politicians are heavily funded by the unions that are funding support for Proposition 27, as listed later. Many of the Congressional Representatives on the list are also members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, whom represent the left-wing of the Democratic Party, known simply as the Progressives.

Why are incumbent politicians funding Proposition 27? They want the old, pre-Proposition 11 redistricting process back to protect their political careers. In an interview with the Orange Counter Register during the 2001 California redistricting process, Rep. Loretta Sanchez, sister of Proposition 27 funder Rep. Linda Sanchez, explained how the gerrymandering system worked:
"Twenty thousand [dollars] is nothing to keep your seat. I spend $2 million [dollars campaigning] every year. If my colleagues are smart, they'll pay their $20,000, and Michael [Berman, brother of Proposition 27 funder Howard Berman] will draw the district they can win in. Those who have refused to pay? God help them."

U.S. Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D), 8th Congressional District
U.S. Congressman Xavier Becerra, (D), 31st Congressional District
U.S. Congressman Howard Berman (D), 28th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Lois Capps (D), 23rd Congressional District
  • Friends of Lois Capps: $10,000
  • IBEW, AFSCME, Carpenters & Joiners, Operating Engineers, AFT, and fire fighter unions are major contributors
  • WhoRunsGov.com profile for Lois Capps
  • Also contributed to No on Prop. 77
  • The CA-23 district map is perhaps the best example of a highly-Gerrymandered district, covering just select coastal communities. The district is 200 miles long and only 100 yards wide in some places. Voters joke that it sometimes disappears during high tide.
U.S. Congresswoman, Judy Chu (D), 32nd Congressional District
  • TruePAC - Concerned Citizens including Judy Chu to Support Proposition 27: $125,000
  • Judy Chu for Congress: $10,000
  • Possible connections to another $90,000 from the Californians for Trust, Responsibility, Unity, and Empowerment PAC listed below
  • Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus
  • AFT, Carpenters & Joiners, AFSCME, IBEW, and Operating Engineers unions are major contributors
  • WhoRunsGov.com profile for Judy Chu
  • Spouse of California Assemblyman Mike Eng, who also funds Proposition 27
  • The CA-32 district map also shows signs of Gerrymandering
U.S. Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D), 14th Congressional District
U.S. Congressman Sam Farr (D), 17th Congressional District
U.S. Congressman Mike Honda (D), 15th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D), 9th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (D), 16th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Doris Matsui (D), 5th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Laura Richardson (D), 37th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Lucille Roybal-Allard (D), 34th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (D), 39th Congressional District
U.S. Congressman Adam Schiff (D), 29th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D), 12th Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Diane Watson (D), 33rd Congressional District
U.S. Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey (D), 6th Congressional District
U.S. Congressman George Miller (D), 7th Congressional District
State Senator Alex Padilla (D), 20th State Senate District
  • Padilla for Senate: $39,000
  • California 2020 Senator Alex Padilla's Ballot Measure Committee: $21,572
  • AFSCME and California Pipe Trades Council unions are major contributors
California Assembly Speaker, John A. Perez (D), 46th Assembly District
  • Current California Assembly Speaker
  • Building California's Future: John A. Perez Ballot Measure Committee: $49,000
  • California Pipe Trades Council and California Operating Engineers unions are major contributors
Assemblywoman Karen Bass (D), 47th Assembly District
Assembly Assemblyman Bob Blumenfield (D), 40th Assembly District
  • Bob Blumenfield for Assembly 2010: $85,000
  • California Pipe Trades and Carpenters unions are major contributors
Assemblyman Charles Calderon (D), 58th Assembly District
  • Charles Calderon for Assembly 2010: $100,000
  • California Pipe Trades unions are major contributors
Assemblyman Mike Eng (D), 49th Assembly District
Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes (D), 39th Assembly District
  • Felipe Fuentes Reform California Ballot Measure Committee: $20,000
  • Fuentes for Assembly 2010: $10,000
  • California Pipe Trades unions are major contributors
Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner (D), 14th Assembly District
  • Skinner for Assembly 2010: $30,000
  • Electrical Workers, California Pipe Trades, and Operating Engineers are major contributors
Assemblyman Bill Monning (D), 39th Assembly District
  • Friends of Bill Monning: $5,000
  • California Pipe Trades, Electrical Workers, Firefighters, and Teachers unions are major contributors
Labor Unions, a Traditional Ally of California Democrats

The following labor unions are long-time allies of California Democrats and heavily fund the campaigns of the incumbent Democrats listed above. Among the California Congressional Representatives listed, these unions contributed nearly $3.8 million to their campaigns during their careers.

(also view spreadsheet at http://www.editgrid.com/user/soquel_by_the_creek/proposition_27_congress_union_contributions)


American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)
American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
Carpenters and Joiners Union
Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
International Association of Fire Fighters
Electrical Workers Unions (IBEW)

Various Electrical Workers unions contributed over $150,000 combined. According to OpenSecrets.org, IBEW contributed over $780,000 to the California Congressional Representatives listed above and is a Top-20 donor to all but two members.
  • The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers is a member union of the AFL-CIO
  • California State Association of Electrical Workers: $50,000
  • International Brotherhood of Electric Workers (IBEW) Educational Committee: $50,000
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local No. 47: $50,000
  • The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) is #6 on the top campaign contributors list, contributing 97% of their member's money to Democrats
  • OpenSecrets.org information page for IBEW
  • Also contributed to No on Prop. 77
Pipe Trade Unions
Teamsters Union
Big Money Contributors to the Democratic Party

The following list is especially ironic given President Obama's apparent concern about groups like Americans for Prosperity (AFP) and the Koch brothers. Is the President more comfortable with this group? Why are so many out-of-state people and organizations attempting to influence California's elections? Oh, the hypocrisy of it all.

Many of the individual donors to Proposition 27 are also big-money contributors to various Democratic Party organizations such as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), headed by Speaker Pelosi, and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC).

Perhaps not surprisingly, many of these individuals are also big-money donors to former-President Clinton's foundation. Similarly, George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Harold Ickes were chief organizers of the so-called Shadow Democratic Party and Louise Gund and Fred Eychaner are probable members due to their heavy funding of 527 political organizations that fund Democrat Party causes.

I am an unabashed supporter of Israel. Consequently, I am surprised by many of the pro-Israel connections to the Yes on Proposition 27 effort. I had never heard of Haim Saban until I began researching this article. Surprisingly, many of the incumbent Democrat politicians supporting Proposition 27, in my opinion, do not necessarily support Israel. Howard Berman is perhaps unique in his public support for Israel. For the other politicians, perhaps the pro-Israel lobby hopes to develop a relationship similar to the labor unions. The incumbent Democrats listed above have provided certain political services in return for continued campaign contributions from labor unions. Regardless, I hope this recent trend does not indicate that the Israelis want to influence California state politics!

This following list only includes individuals contributing more than $20,000 as of 30-SEPT-2010. Only contributions exceeding $50,000 are highlighted in red. There are other smaller contributors listed here. The individuals are listed from largest contribution, downward.

Haim Saban
Louise Gund

Peter G. Angelos

George Soros
Edith Wasserman
    Fred Eychaner
    Steven S. Myers
    • $100,000 contribution
    • CEO/Chairman of Dolphin Capital Holdings, Inc.
    • Former CEO of SM&A, a firm that works with companies on government procurement and projects
    • Forbes profile on Steven S. Myers
    • CorporationWiki profile on Steven S. Myers
    • The Full Wiki profile on Steven Myers
    • CampaignMoney.com profile on Steven Myers
    • Contributed $60,400 to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in 2010
    • Contributed $30,400 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) in 2010
    Steven R. Zax
    • See $100,000 contribution from Zenith Insurance Company below
    Jack C. Bendheim
    Joseph W. Cotchett
    Kathryn Hall
    C. Paul Johnson
    Stephen Grand
    George M. Marcus
    Stewart ResnickLloyd Thomas Galloway
    Corporate Contributors

    Zenith Insurance Company
    Thirty-O-Seven, Inc.
    Political Action Committees (PACs)

    The following political action committees (PACs) also made contributions, but are not directly associated with either the politicians or unions listed above. The $125,000 from TruePAC was directly associated with Congesswoman Judy Chu.

    Californians for Trust, Responsibility, Unity, and Empowerment PAC
    • $90,000 contribution
    • There is no web site for this PAC
    • Bill Wong, the PAC contact person of record, was former Chief of Staff to Judy Chu when she was a California Assemblywoman. Judy Chu is now a U.S. Congressional Representative
    • Bill Wong, the PAC contact person of record, was Legislative Director to Mike Honda when he was in the California Assembly. Mike Honda is now a U.S. Congressional Representative
    • Bill Wong, the PAC contact person of record, was Chief of Staff and Press Secretary to then State Senator Hilda Solis. Hilda Solis is currently the U.S. Secretary of Labor in the Obama Administration
    • Judy Chu and Mike Honda are current members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
    • Hilda Solis was a former chairperson of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
    Solidarity PAC
    Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians
    Déjà vu All Over Again (No on Proposition 77)

    I am sure that it is just an amazing coincidence, but many of those funding Proposition 27 also funded the 2005 redistricting ballot initiative, Proposition 77. Proposition 77 was a previous attempt at redistricting reform that failed at the ballot box. Proposition 77 differed in many ways from Proposition 11, approved by voters in 2008.

    It is interesting that the same names and coalitions arrayed against redistricting reform in 2005 are allied again in 2010 for Proposition 27, whose aim is to eliminate the Proposition 11 reforms.

    Here are some of the other strange and amazing coincidences between Proposition 27 and 2005’s Proposition 77.

    Note to Reader
    • I ask for your NO vote on Proposition 27. Other groups not only advocate for NO on Proposition 27 but also for YES on Proposition 20, which would allow the Citizens Redistricting Commission to redraw the U.S. Congressional districts for California. I have not yet determined my position on Proposition 20.
    • I attempt to be fair and accurate in presenting this information and provide links to my references. If you find an error or believe that I am unfairly presenting the information based on available facts, please let me know via the comments section and I will review the specific information. I will post all comments about corrections unless you specifically ask me not to post your comment.
    • If you know of other information that I am missing on this post, please let me know via the comments section.
    Background Information
    Revision History